<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (3) TMI 47 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37832</link>
    <description>Unquoted shares in a continuing business are ordinarily valued on the yield or profit-earning capacity method, while break-up value is reserved for exceptional cases such as winding up. On that basis, maintainable profits and past dividend history were treated as a permissible valuation approach, and no capital gain was found to arise on the sale. The commentary also states that &quot;plant&quot; is to be construed broadly for development rebate purposes and can include business apparatus such as coal tubs, pipes and ropes, provided the statutory reserve requirement is met. The assessee&#039;s position was accepted on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:50:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (3) TMI 47 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37832</link>
      <description>Unquoted shares in a continuing business are ordinarily valued on the yield or profit-earning capacity method, while break-up value is reserved for exceptional cases such as winding up. On that basis, maintainable profits and past dividend history were treated as a permissible valuation approach, and no capital gain was found to arise on the sale. The commentary also states that &quot;plant&quot; is to be construed broadly for development rebate purposes and can include business apparatus such as coal tubs, pipes and ropes, provided the statutory reserve requirement is met. The assessee&#039;s position was accepted on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>