<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 607 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756903</link>
    <description>CESTAT Bangalore held that service tax cannot be levied on software product updates where invoices and payments were made prior to 16.05.2008, before service tax became applicable to Information Technology Software Services (ITSS). The tribunal ruled that taxable service provisions cannot extend to periods when service tax was not liable. Following precedent from Carrier Point v. Commissioner, contracts concluded before tax levy dates do not attract service tax. The tribunal found no suppression of facts warranting extended limitation period, as appellant could not be expected to declare pre-levy transactions. Appeal allowed, impugned order set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 08:24:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 607 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756903</link>
      <description>CESTAT Bangalore held that service tax cannot be levied on software product updates where invoices and payments were made prior to 16.05.2008, before service tax became applicable to Information Technology Software Services (ITSS). The tribunal ruled that taxable service provisions cannot extend to periods when service tax was not liable. Following precedent from Carrier Point v. Commissioner, contracts concluded before tax levy dates do not attract service tax. The tribunal found no suppression of facts warranting extended limitation period, as appellant could not be expected to declare pre-levy transactions. Appeal allowed, impugned order set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>