https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756899 CESTAT Allahabad disposed of an appeal concerning service tax recovery with interest and penalty for services received from abroad before and after 18.04.2006. The tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) remand order, finding no malafide intent by the appellant as the matter involved interpretation of law with conflicting tribunal decisions. Extended period of limitation could not be invoked where legal interpretation disputes exist. The demand prior to 18.04.2006 was set aside based on HC precedents, and the matter was remanded for re-quantification of demand to the Original Authority. en-us Thu, 08 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Aug 2024 18:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756899 CESTAT Allahabad disposed of an appeal concerning service tax recovery with interest and penalty for services received from abroad before and after 18.04.2006. The tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) remand order, finding no malafide intent by the appellant as the matter involved interpretation of law with conflicting tribunal decisions. Extended period of limitation could not be invoked where legal interpretation disputes exist. The demand prior to 18.04.2006 was set aside based on HC precedents, and the matter was remanded for re-quantification of demand to the Original Authority. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 08 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756899