https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756898 CESTAT Allahabad remanded a service tax recovery case involving differential value liability for FY 2015-16 and 2016-17. The appellant had reconciled differences between Income Tax Authority information and ST-3 returns but failed to produce the reconciliation certificate before the Original Adjudicating Authority. The tribunal found the impugned order was passed without proper consideration of appellant's reconciliation inputs. The appeal was allowed by way of remand for reconsideration in light of the reconciliation certificate. en-us Thu, 08 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:21:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756898 CESTAT Allahabad remanded a service tax recovery case involving differential value liability for FY 2015-16 and 2016-17. The appellant had reconciled differences between Income Tax Authority information and ST-3 returns but failed to produce the reconciliation certificate before the Original Adjudicating Authority. The tribunal found the impugned order was passed without proper consideration of appellant's reconciliation inputs. The appeal was allowed by way of remand for reconsideration in light of the reconciliation certificate. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 08 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756898