<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 592 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756888</link>
    <description>CESTAT Chennai held that Polycril Sector 130, 140 used in granite processing should be classified as consumables rather than raw materials. Following SC precedent in GTN Textiles case, the tribunal found these items do not remain until final product reaches end user - Polycril settles dust particles while Sector 130, 140 polishes granite blocks and disappears. Since goods are used for processing but don&#039;t become part of final product and aren&#039;t essential for manufacturing, they cannot qualify as raw materials under Notification No. 23/2003-CE. Department&#039;s classification as raw materials was unjustified. Appeal allowed, impugned order set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 08:23:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 592 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756888</link>
      <description>CESTAT Chennai held that Polycril Sector 130, 140 used in granite processing should be classified as consumables rather than raw materials. Following SC precedent in GTN Textiles case, the tribunal found these items do not remain until final product reaches end user - Polycril settles dust particles while Sector 130, 140 polishes granite blocks and disappears. Since goods are used for processing but don&#039;t become part of final product and aren&#039;t essential for manufacturing, they cannot qualify as raw materials under Notification No. 23/2003-CE. Department&#039;s classification as raw materials was unjustified. Appeal allowed, impugned order set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>