<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 1383 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456731</link>
    <description>CBDT monetary limit instructions applied to pending departmental appeals, so the Revenue&#039;s appeal was barred where the tax effect was below the prescribed threshold and no stated exception applied. Section 268A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 confirmed the binding character of those monetary limit directions for departmental litigation. On that basis, the appeal was held not maintainable and was dismissed for low tax effect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2024 18:36:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 1383 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456731</link>
      <description>CBDT monetary limit instructions applied to pending departmental appeals, so the Revenue&#039;s appeal was barred where the tax effect was below the prescribed threshold and no stated exception applied. Section 268A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 confirmed the binding character of those monetary limit directions for departmental litigation. On that basis, the appeal was held not maintainable and was dismissed for low tax effect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>