<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1627 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456734</link>
    <description>For a prosecution under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act based on a company cheque, the company must be arraigned as the principal accused and statutory notice must be served on the drawer company. Vicarious liability under Section 141 can arise only when these foundational requirements are met and the complaint contains specific averments showing that the director or officer was in charge of the company&#039;s business at the relevant time. A person cannot be fastened with criminal liability merely because of prior office held. On these facts, the complaint was not maintainable and the proceedings were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2024 18:36:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1627 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456734</link>
      <description>For a prosecution under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act based on a company cheque, the company must be arraigned as the principal accused and statutory notice must be served on the drawer company. Vicarious liability under Section 141 can arise only when these foundational requirements are met and the complaint contains specific averments showing that the director or officer was in charge of the company&#039;s business at the relevant time. A person cannot be fastened with criminal liability merely because of prior office held. On these facts, the complaint was not maintainable and the proceedings were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>