<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (2) TMI 46 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37824</link>
    <description>A contract for sale is treated as speculative for income-tax purposes if it is settled otherwise than by actual delivery, and the statutory expression &quot;contract settled&quot; is wide enough to include settlement after breach. The majority held that damages paid on compromise of a manganese ore sale contract, where no delivery of the contracted goods occurred, fell within the speculative loss definition under the Income-tax Act. The character of the payment as damages did not exclude the statutory rule, because the Act gives &quot;speculative transaction&quot; a special meaning independent of general contract law. A later delivery transaction with another purchaser did not alter the character of the earlier settlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:36:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (2) TMI 46 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37824</link>
      <description>A contract for sale is treated as speculative for income-tax purposes if it is settled otherwise than by actual delivery, and the statutory expression &quot;contract settled&quot; is wide enough to include settlement after breach. The majority held that damages paid on compromise of a manganese ore sale contract, where no delivery of the contracted goods occurred, fell within the speculative loss definition under the Income-tax Act. The character of the payment as damages did not exclude the statutory rule, because the Act gives &quot;speculative transaction&quot; a special meaning independent of general contract law. A later delivery transaction with another purchaser did not alter the character of the earlier settlement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>