<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 578 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756874</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the orders dated 29.06.2019 and 04.08.2020 due to a violation of the principles of natural justice, as the petitioner was not granted a personal hearing under Section 75(4) CGST Act. A Writ of Certiorari was issued, and the second respondent was directed to conduct a personal hearing and issue a new order within four weeks. The Writ Petition was allowed, granting relief to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 578 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756874</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the orders dated 29.06.2019 and 04.08.2020 due to a violation of the principles of natural justice, as the petitioner was not granted a personal hearing under Section 75(4) CGST Act. A Writ of Certiorari was issued, and the second respondent was directed to conduct a personal hearing and issue a new order within four weeks. The Writ Petition was allowed, granting relief to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>