<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 572 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756868</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the petition challenging an order under the Delhi GST Act, 2017, due to improper notice placement on the portal. It set aside the order and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication. The portal was redesigned, and the petitioner has two weeks to respond to the notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 10:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 572 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756868</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the petition challenging an order under the Delhi GST Act, 2017, due to improper notice placement on the portal. It set aside the order and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication. The portal was redesigned, and the petitioner has two weeks to respond to the notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>