<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 559 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756855</link>
    <description>The HC held that notices issued under section 148 were illegal and invalid because the Junior Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to issue them, particularly in light of Section 151A and the Central Government notification of 29 March 2022. Relying on an earlier HC decision construing the same provisions, the court found non-compliance with the mandated faceless assessment framework and therefore allowed the petition in favour of the assessee, quashing the impugned notices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 559 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756855</link>
      <description>The HC held that notices issued under section 148 were illegal and invalid because the Junior Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to issue them, particularly in light of Section 151A and the Central Government notification of 29 March 2022. Relying on an earlier HC decision construing the same provisions, the court found non-compliance with the mandated faceless assessment framework and therefore allowed the petition in favour of the assessee, quashing the impugned notices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>