<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 556 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756852</link>
    <description>The Madras HC addressed petitioners&#039; claim for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) regarding interest from cooperative banks. The court found petitioners neglected assessment proceedings by failing to file returns under Section 139(4) and not participating after Section 148 notices. While ruling that exemption availability under Section 80P(2)(d) cannot be decided under Article 226, the court granted petitioners another opportunity. The impugned orders were quashed and cases remitted for fresh assessment from show cause notice stage. Each petitioner was directed to pay Rs. 10,000 to Siddha Centre, Madura within 15 days and participate in de-novo proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2024 09:05:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 556 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756852</link>
      <description>The Madras HC addressed petitioners&#039; claim for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) regarding interest from cooperative banks. The court found petitioners neglected assessment proceedings by failing to file returns under Section 139(4) and not participating after Section 148 notices. While ruling that exemption availability under Section 80P(2)(d) cannot be decided under Article 226, the court granted petitioners another opportunity. The impugned orders were quashed and cases remitted for fresh assessment from show cause notice stage. Each petitioner was directed to pay Rs. 10,000 to Siddha Centre, Madura within 15 days and participate in de-novo proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>