<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 554 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756850</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the deletion of the Rs. 1.50 lakh penalty imposed under section 271B of the Income Tax Act. It concluded that section 44AB does not apply when income is exempt under section 10 and does not fall under &quot;profits and gains of business or profession,&quot; thus nullifying the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2024 09:05:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 554 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756850</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the deletion of the Rs. 1.50 lakh penalty imposed under section 271B of the Income Tax Act. It concluded that section 44AB does not apply when income is exempt under section 10 and does not fall under &quot;profits and gains of business or profession,&quot; thus nullifying the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>