<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 536 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756832</link>
    <description>Employees&#039; contribution to PF and ESI was treated as not liable to disallowance under section 36(1)(va) on the peculiar facts of a COVID-19 lockdown delay. The deposits were made immediately after lockdown and banking restrictions were relaxed, and the EPF authority&#039;s circular dated 15.05.2020 waived penal damages and stated that no proceedings would be initiated for such delayed remittance during the lockdown period. Although Checkmate Services was noted, the delay was distinguished as brief, lockdown-linked, and not suggestive of misuse of employees&#039; contributions. The disallowance was therefore held unsustainable and the addition deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2024 09:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 536 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756832</link>
      <description>Employees&#039; contribution to PF and ESI was treated as not liable to disallowance under section 36(1)(va) on the peculiar facts of a COVID-19 lockdown delay. The deposits were made immediately after lockdown and banking restrictions were relaxed, and the EPF authority&#039;s circular dated 15.05.2020 waived penal damages and stated that no proceedings would be initiated for such delayed remittance during the lockdown period. Although Checkmate Services was noted, the delay was distinguished as brief, lockdown-linked, and not suggestive of misuse of employees&#039; contributions. The disallowance was therefore held unsustainable and the addition deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>