<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 525 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756821</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, remitting the disputed issues back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal emphasized the principles of natural justice, directing the CIT(A) to provide the assessee with an adequate opportunity to present their case, addressing issues on trademark depreciation and disallowance under section 14A r.w.r 8D.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2024 09:04:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 525 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756821</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, remitting the disputed issues back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal emphasized the principles of natural justice, directing the CIT(A) to provide the assessee with an adequate opportunity to present their case, addressing issues on trademark depreciation and disallowance under section 14A r.w.r 8D.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>