<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 1359 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456721</link>
    <description>The ITAT Bangalore ruled on disallowance under section 36(1)(va) for delayed payment of employees&#039; contribution to PF and ESI. The tribunal rejected the assessee&#039;s contention that no disallowance could be made under section 143(1)(a) for employees&#039; EPF and ESI contributions. For payments delayed in August-September 2017, the matter was remitted to the AO for examination. Following the SC decision in Checkmate Services, the tribunal held that employees&#039; contributions must be deposited within due dates under relevant welfare legislation, failing which they become taxable income. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 22:42:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 1359 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456721</link>
      <description>The ITAT Bangalore ruled on disallowance under section 36(1)(va) for delayed payment of employees&#039; contribution to PF and ESI. The tribunal rejected the assessee&#039;s contention that no disallowance could be made under section 143(1)(a) for employees&#039; EPF and ESI contributions. For payments delayed in August-September 2017, the matter was remitted to the AO for examination. Following the SC decision in Checkmate Services, the tribunal held that employees&#039; contributions must be deposited within due dates under relevant welfare legislation, failing which they become taxable income. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>