https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456710 The Ct held that the plaintiff's claim for arrears from 1951 to 1957 was barred by limitation, as Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1908, did not apply. The cause of action was distinct from earlier proceedings, which lacked jurisdictional defects. The plaintiff was awarded a decree for arrears from 1957 to 1959, with costs, despite the main limitation issue favoring the defendant. en-us Fri, 19 Aug 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Aug 2024 14:56:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456710 The Ct held that the plaintiff's claim for arrears from 1951 to 1957 was barred by limitation, as Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1908, did not apply. The cause of action was distinct from earlier proceedings, which lacked jurisdictional defects. The plaintiff was awarded a decree for arrears from 1957 to 1959, with costs, despite the main limitation issue favoring the defendant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Aug 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456710