<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty Under Income Tax Act Overturned Due to Lack of Hearing; Professional&#039;s Plea on Mental Health Considered Reasonable.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80291</link>
    <description>Review petition - Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Tribunal sustaining the levy without providing an opportunity of hearing - Review applicant had paid entire tax amount for assessment years in question - Held that review applicant has not filed applications based on new facts - Materials collected during search never put to review applicant prior to filing voluntary revised returns - No deliberate or wilful omission on part of review applicant - Review applicant on same footing as Dr. R. Gopalakrishnan entitled to same relief - Plea of review applicant being professional doctor rendering service to downtrodden people and levying penalty would affect mental status and professional career appears bona fide and reasonable, merits acceptance - Judgment recalled, Tax Case Appeals disposed of by setting aside order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 10:29:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 10:29:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty Under Income Tax Act Overturned Due to Lack of Hearing; Professional&#039;s Plea on Mental Health Considered Reasonable.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80291</link>
      <description>Review petition - Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Tribunal sustaining the levy without providing an opportunity of hearing - Review applicant had paid entire tax amount for assessment years in question - Held that review applicant has not filed applications based on new facts - Materials collected during search never put to review applicant prior to filing voluntary revised returns - No deliberate or wilful omission on part of review applicant - Review applicant on same footing as Dr. R. Gopalakrishnan entitled to same relief - Plea of review applicant being professional doctor rendering service to downtrodden people and levying penalty would affect mental status and professional career appears bona fide and reasonable, merits acceptance - Judgment recalled, Tax Case Appeals disposed of by setting aside order.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 10:29:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>