<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (1) TMI 31 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37805</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to apply the yield or rental method over the reversionary method in determining the fair market value of a property. The valuation based on a multiple of 12 1/2 was deemed appropriate, dismissing the appeal and awarding costs to the respondent. The court highlighted the significance of statutory rent controls in property valuation, aligning with established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:01:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (1) TMI 31 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37805</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to apply the yield or rental method over the reversionary method in determining the fair market value of a property. The valuation based on a multiple of 12 1/2 was deemed appropriate, dismissing the appeal and awarding costs to the respondent. The court highlighted the significance of statutory rent controls in property valuation, aligning with established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>