<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 489 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756785</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Addl./Joint CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict disallowance on bogus purchases to 12.5% of the declared gross profit rate for the assessment year 2009-10. The Tribunal cited precedent from the assessee&#039;s previous case, affirming that if the gross profit rate exceeded 12.5%, no disallowance was warranted. The decision emphasized adherence to established legal principles and the significance of the declared gross profit rate in determining disallowance extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 489 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756785</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Addl./Joint CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict disallowance on bogus purchases to 12.5% of the declared gross profit rate for the assessment year 2009-10. The Tribunal cited precedent from the assessee&#039;s previous case, affirming that if the gross profit rate exceeded 12.5%, no disallowance was warranted. The decision emphasized adherence to established legal principles and the significance of the declared gross profit rate in determining disallowance extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>