<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 479 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756775</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal and granting consequential reliefs. It recognized the appellant&#039;s eligibility for drawback, concluding that valid reasons were presented for not filing drawback shipping bills initially. The Tribunal found the Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the claim unjustifiable, emphasizing that the Board Circular was binding and discretion should have been exercised judiciously.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 08:55:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 479 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756775</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal and granting consequential reliefs. It recognized the appellant&#039;s eligibility for drawback, concluding that valid reasons were presented for not filing drawback shipping bills initially. The Tribunal found the Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the claim unjustifiable, emphasizing that the Board Circular was binding and discretion should have been exercised judiciously.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>