<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 479 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756775</link>
    <description>The drawback framework permits exemption from the requirement of filing drawback shipping bills where non-filing occurred for reasons beyond the exporter&#039;s control, and departmental circulars also recognise drawback on free shipping bills when the prescribed conditions are met. Confusion created by the relevant notifications, including a later notification specifically listing cereals and clarifying the category, was treated as a sufficient explanation for the failure to claim drawback at the time of export. The Commissioner&#039;s discretion had to be exercised judicially on the facts, and a rigid insistence on strict proof in these circumstances was held unjustified. The rejection of the drawback claim was set aside and drawback was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 08:55:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 479 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756775</link>
      <description>The drawback framework permits exemption from the requirement of filing drawback shipping bills where non-filing occurred for reasons beyond the exporter&#039;s control, and departmental circulars also recognise drawback on free shipping bills when the prescribed conditions are met. Confusion created by the relevant notifications, including a later notification specifically listing cereals and clarifying the category, was treated as a sufficient explanation for the failure to claim drawback at the time of export. The Commissioner&#039;s discretion had to be exercised judicially on the facts, and a rigid insistence on strict proof in these circumstances was held unjustified. The rejection of the drawback claim was set aside and drawback was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>