<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 477 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756773</link>
    <description>Assignment of a corporate debtor&#039;s admitted debt under an approved resolution plan did not extinguish the financial creditor&#039;s right to proceed against a personal guarantor where the plan expressly excluded personal and corporate guarantees from the assignment. Wilful defaulter proceedings under the RBI Master Circular were treated as operating in rem because the declaration affects credit availability across the banking system. Post-NPA defaults could still support a wilful defaulter case, as the Circular contains no bar on later defaulting conduct. Clause 2.6 applied prospectively only to guarantees executed on or after 9 September 2014, so it did not cover a guarantee executed earlier; the wilful defaulter declaration against the personal guarantor was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 08:55:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 477 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756773</link>
      <description>Assignment of a corporate debtor&#039;s admitted debt under an approved resolution plan did not extinguish the financial creditor&#039;s right to proceed against a personal guarantor where the plan expressly excluded personal and corporate guarantees from the assignment. Wilful defaulter proceedings under the RBI Master Circular were treated as operating in rem because the declaration affects credit availability across the banking system. Post-NPA defaults could still support a wilful defaulter case, as the Circular contains no bar on later defaulting conduct. Clause 2.6 applied prospectively only to guarantees executed on or after 9 September 2014, so it did not cover a guarantee executed earlier; the wilful defaulter declaration against the personal guarantor was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>