https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756766 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is ordinarily declined where the controversy turns on disputed questions of fact and an efficacious statutory remedy exists. The dispute here concerned the identity of the business entity and the legality of the inspection, both requiring factual determination not suited to writ proceedings. An appellate remedy was available before the jurisdictional authority under Section 62 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, so the petitioner was directed to pursue that statutory course instead of invoking writ relief. en-us Thu, 01 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Aug 2024 08:55:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756766 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is ordinarily declined where the controversy turns on disputed questions of fact and an efficacious statutory remedy exists. The dispute here concerned the identity of the business entity and the legality of the inspection, both requiring factual determination not suited to writ proceedings. An appellate remedy was available before the jurisdictional authority under Section 62 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, so the petitioner was directed to pursue that statutory course instead of invoking writ relief. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 01 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756766