<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 470 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756766</link>
    <description>The HC disposed of the Writ Petition, directing the petitioner, a registered partnership firm, to pursue the alternative statutory remedy under Section 62 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The court emphasized adherence to legal procedures for resolving tax disputes, underscoring principles of administrative law and due process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 08:55:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 470 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756766</link>
      <description>The HC disposed of the Writ Petition, directing the petitioner, a registered partnership firm, to pursue the alternative statutory remedy under Section 62 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The court emphasized adherence to legal procedures for resolving tax disputes, underscoring principles of administrative law and due process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>