<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1834 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456693</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal in limine for non-prosecution because no one appeared on the hearing date and no adjournment request was filed despite service of notice. The Tribunal followed the Multiplan India principle to treat the appeal as not being actively prosecuted, while leaving the assessee liberty to seek recall of the order on showing sufficient cause for non-appearance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 00:18:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1834 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456693</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal in limine for non-prosecution because no one appeared on the hearing date and no adjournment request was filed despite service of notice. The Tribunal followed the Multiplan India principle to treat the appeal as not being actively prosecuted, while leaving the assessee liberty to seek recall of the order on showing sufficient cause for non-appearance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>