<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1834 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456700</link>
    <description>The Kerala HC upheld the constitutional validity of tax provisions classifying medicated talcum powder under entries subjecting it to 20% tax rate versus medicines taxed at 8%. The petitioner challenged the classification of prickly heat powder (Nycil brand) as medicated talcum powder under KGST Act entries 127 (1992-1999) and 144 (2000-2005), claiming violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265. The HC ruled that fiscal measures in taxing statutes cannot be deemed arbitrary despite being harsh, and legislative provisions cannot be struck down lightly without substantial evidence of unconstitutionality. The petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 00:18:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1834 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456700</link>
      <description>The Kerala HC upheld the constitutional validity of tax provisions classifying medicated talcum powder under entries subjecting it to 20% tax rate versus medicines taxed at 8%. The petitioner challenged the classification of prickly heat powder (Nycil brand) as medicated talcum powder under KGST Act entries 127 (1992-1999) and 144 (2000-2005), claiming violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265. The HC ruled that fiscal measures in taxing statutes cannot be deemed arbitrary despite being harsh, and legislative provisions cannot be struck down lightly without substantial evidence of unconstitutionality. The petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>