https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456686 The judgment upheld the Small Causes Court's decision, ruling that the letter dated 5-2-1975 was not protected under Sections 126 or 129 of the Evidence Act, as it was not a confidential communication between a client and legal adviser. The petition was dismissed, and the Corporation was ordered to pay costs to the respondents. en-us Fri, 13 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Aug 2024 16:37:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456686 The judgment upheld the Small Causes Court's decision, ruling that the letter dated 5-2-1975 was not protected under Sections 126 or 129 of the Evidence Act, as it was not a confidential communication between a client and legal adviser. The petition was dismissed, and the Corporation was ordered to pay costs to the respondents. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456686