https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456684 The HC quashed the judgment and decree of the City Civil Court, Ahmedabad, in Civil Suit No. 1007 of 1973, dismissing the suit. The plaintiff failed to establish the execution of the promissory note, while the defendant proved its inauthenticity. The communication with advocate Mr. Giriani was not privileged under Sec. 126 of the Indian Evidence Act due to its illegal purpose. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs. en-us Fri, 16 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Aug 2024 16:31:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456684 The HC quashed the judgment and decree of the City Civil Court, Ahmedabad, in Civil Suit No. 1007 of 1973, dismissing the suit. The plaintiff failed to establish the execution of the promissory note, while the defendant proved its inauthenticity. The communication with advocate Mr. Giriani was not privileged under Sec. 126 of the Indian Evidence Act due to its illegal purpose. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456684