https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456683 The HC found the Sub-Divisional Magistrate's order of discharge to be perverse and unsound, as the questions were deemed defamatory and put by the advocate under the accused's instructions. However, due to the passage of time and the vindication of the complainant's character, the HC dismissed the revision case, deeming further proceedings unnecessary. The court clarified the responsibilities between advocate and client, emphasizing that the client bears liability for defamatory statements made through counsel, and outlined the limited scope of legal privilege and remedies available to defamed witnesses. en-us Mon, 05 Jan 1953 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Aug 2024 16:28:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456683 The HC found the Sub-Divisional Magistrate's order of discharge to be perverse and unsound, as the questions were deemed defamatory and put by the advocate under the accused's instructions. However, due to the passage of time and the vindication of the complainant's character, the HC dismissed the revision case, deeming further proceedings unnecessary. The court clarified the responsibilities between advocate and client, emphasizing that the client bears liability for defamatory statements made through counsel, and outlined the limited scope of legal privilege and remedies available to defamed witnesses. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Jan 1953 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456683