https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756755 A writ petition challenging detention-related GST penalty was not entertained at the first instance because an alternative statutory appeal remedy was available. The petitioners were directed to approach the appellate authority, and the appeal was to be decided on merits. Since the entire penalty was already secured by bond and bank guarantee, the appellate authority was directed not to insist again on further pre-deposit, so long as the security remained valid. en-us Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 May 2025 00:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756755 A writ petition challenging detention-related GST penalty was not entertained at the first instance because an alternative statutory appeal remedy was available. The petitioners were directed to approach the appellate authority, and the appeal was to be decided on merits. Since the entire penalty was already secured by bond and bank guarantee, the appellate authority was directed not to insist again on further pre-deposit, so long as the security remained valid. Case-Laws GST Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756755