<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (7) TMI 2 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37795</link>
    <description>Legal expenses in civil proceedings are deductible only if they are shown to have been incurred wholly and exclusively for the assessee&#039;s business and to have a direct business nexus. Here, the company failed to explain why it resisted a share transfer, so reliance on its articles of association was insufficient to prove business purpose. The expense incurred in opposing the appointment of a Government inspector also lacked the required bona fide business connection, as the proper course was to meet the inquiry and demonstrate regular conduct. Both deductions were therefore disallowed under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:45:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (7) TMI 2 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37795</link>
      <description>Legal expenses in civil proceedings are deductible only if they are shown to have been incurred wholly and exclusively for the assessee&#039;s business and to have a direct business nexus. Here, the company failed to explain why it resisted a share transfer, so reliance on its articles of association was insufficient to prove business purpose. The expense incurred in opposing the appointment of a Government inspector also lacked the required bona fide business connection, as the proper course was to meet the inquiry and demonstrate regular conduct. Both deductions were therefore disallowed under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>