https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756749 The HC quashed the impugned orders by the Additional Commissioner and Assistant Commissioner regarding the detention of goods due to an E-way bill issue. The court found no intent to evade tax and emphasized that technical errors without such intent do not warrant penalties under Section 129(3) of the Act. The writ petition was allowed, and the court ordered the return of security and refund of any deposited amounts to the petitioner within specified timeframes. en-us Fri, 02 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Aug 2024 20:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756749 The HC quashed the impugned orders by the Additional Commissioner and Assistant Commissioner regarding the detention of goods due to an E-way bill issue. The court found no intent to evade tax and emphasized that technical errors without such intent do not warrant penalties under Section 129(3) of the Act. The writ petition was allowed, and the court ordered the return of security and refund of any deposited amounts to the petitioner within specified timeframes. Case-Laws GST Fri, 02 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756749