https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756744 A writ petition seeking GST refund was not maintainable because the GST framework provides a specific statutory refund mechanism. The petitioner was directed to pursue the claim under the refund procedure in the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, including recourse to the competent authority under section 54. The court noted that any further grievance could be taken through the available dispute resolution process, including before the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran. Writ jurisdiction could not be used to bypass an efficacious statutory remedy. en-us Thu, 01 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 May 2025 10:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756744 A writ petition seeking GST refund was not maintainable because the GST framework provides a specific statutory refund mechanism. The petitioner was directed to pursue the claim under the refund procedure in the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, including recourse to the competent authority under section 54. The court noted that any further grievance could be taken through the available dispute resolution process, including before the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran. Writ jurisdiction could not be used to bypass an efficacious statutory remedy. Case-Laws GST Thu, 01 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756744