https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756738 A writ petition challenging a demand-cum-show-cause notice is ordinarily not entertained unless the notice is shown to be without inherent jurisdiction. Jurisdictional objections based on the absence of a proper notification and the character of supply of ENA involved mixed factual and legal questions that were suitable for examination by the issuing authority. Executive correspondence from the State Government, by itself, was insufficient to establish GST exemption. The notice was therefore not treated as a nullity, and interference at the threshold was declined, leaving the petitioner to file objections before the authority. en-us Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 May 2025 14:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756738 A writ petition challenging a demand-cum-show-cause notice is ordinarily not entertained unless the notice is shown to be without inherent jurisdiction. Jurisdictional objections based on the absence of a proper notification and the character of supply of ENA involved mixed factual and legal questions that were suitable for examination by the issuing authority. Executive correspondence from the State Government, by itself, was insufficient to establish GST exemption. The notice was therefore not treated as a nullity, and interference at the threshold was declined, leaving the petitioner to file objections before the authority. Case-Laws GST Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756738