https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756737 Where a GST order is challenged under Article 226 and a statutory appeal is available under Section 107, the High Court should ordinarily decline to exercise writ jurisdiction. The document notes complaints that the impugned order was not a speaking order and that a rectification application had not been considered, but the Court found no reason to entertain the writ petition in the presence of an effective alternative remedy. It therefore declined to examine the merits and granted liberty to withdraw the petition and pursue the statutory appellate forum, which is competent to address the grievances raised. en-us Thu, 06 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 May 2025 16:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756737 Where a GST order is challenged under Article 226 and a statutory appeal is available under Section 107, the High Court should ordinarily decline to exercise writ jurisdiction. The document notes complaints that the impugned order was not a speaking order and that a rectification application had not been considered, but the Court found no reason to entertain the writ petition in the presence of an effective alternative remedy. It therefore declined to examine the merits and granted liberty to withdraw the petition and pursue the statutory appellate forum, which is competent to address the grievances raised. Case-Laws GST Thu, 06 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756737