<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 430 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756726</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, reducing the disallowance rate for purchases and administrative expenses to 5% for the assessment year 2015-16. Initially, the AO had disallowed 50% of expenses due to non-compliance, which was reduced to 20% by the First Appellate Authority. The ITAT found the 20% rate unreasonable considering the appellant&#039;s construction business, thus lowering it to 5%. The decision was pronounced on 6th August 2024.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 09:10:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 430 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756726</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, reducing the disallowance rate for purchases and administrative expenses to 5% for the assessment year 2015-16. Initially, the AO had disallowed 50% of expenses due to non-compliance, which was reduced to 20% by the First Appellate Authority. The ITAT found the 20% rate unreasonable considering the appellant&#039;s construction business, thus lowering it to 5%. The decision was pronounced on 6th August 2024.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>