<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court ruled interest alone on loan doesn&#039;t count as operational debt. App rejected due to interest inclusion below threshold. Dismissal upheld by NCLAT.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80236</link>
    <description>The case deals with the maintainability of an application u/s 4 of the Code based on the minimum default amount. The court held that interest alone on a loan does not constitute operational debt. Citing relevant cases, it was emphasized that interest cannot be recovered without a signed agreement. The application, below the threshold amount, was rejected due to the inclusion of interest. Additionally, a pre-existing dispute over cheques was noted, with the Respondent alleging fraud by the Appellant. The Adjudicating Authority rightly dismissed the application, considering the threshold amount and pre-existing disputes. The appeal was subsequently dismissed by the NCLAT.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 09:09:16 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 09:09:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court ruled interest alone on loan doesn&#039;t count as operational debt. App rejected due to interest inclusion below threshold. Dismissal upheld by NCLAT.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80236</link>
      <description>The case deals with the maintainability of an application u/s 4 of the Code based on the minimum default amount. The court held that interest alone on a loan does not constitute operational debt. Citing relevant cases, it was emphasized that interest cannot be recovered without a signed agreement. The application, below the threshold amount, was rejected due to the inclusion of interest. Additionally, a pre-existing dispute over cheques was noted, with the Respondent alleging fraud by the Appellant. The Adjudicating Authority rightly dismissed the application, considering the threshold amount and pre-existing disputes. The appeal was subsequently dismissed by the NCLAT.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 09:09:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>