<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 405 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756701</link>
    <description>NCLAT set aside tribunal&#039;s dismissal of Section 7 application that was rejected without hearing arguments, holding that principles of natural justice require parties be heard before condemnation. The appeal was allowed and matter remanded for fresh consideration with speaking order after hearing both parties. Additionally, NCLAT overturned tribunal&#039;s dismissal of Section 60(5), 65 and 75 applications filed before Section 7 admission, clarifying that Section 65 applications are maintainable after filing of Section 7/9/10 applications, not after admission. Relying on SC precedent in Beacon Trusteeship and NCLAT decisions, the tribunal erred in dismissing applications solely on timing grounds. Both matters remanded for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 405 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756701</link>
      <description>NCLAT set aside tribunal&#039;s dismissal of Section 7 application that was rejected without hearing arguments, holding that principles of natural justice require parties be heard before condemnation. The appeal was allowed and matter remanded for fresh consideration with speaking order after hearing both parties. Additionally, NCLAT overturned tribunal&#039;s dismissal of Section 60(5), 65 and 75 applications filed before Section 7 admission, clarifying that Section 65 applications are maintainable after filing of Section 7/9/10 applications, not after admission. Relying on SC precedent in Beacon Trusteeship and NCLAT decisions, the tribunal erred in dismissing applications solely on timing grounds. Both matters remanded for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>