<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 402 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756698</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC allowed a petition challenging rejection of declarations under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. The revenue authorities had rejected applications citing bank guarantee basis and unquantified amounts. The court held that since the main noticee&#039;s declaration was accepted after amount quantification before June 30, 2019, the co-noticee was also entitled to scheme benefits. The court directed authorities to accept the co-noticee&#039;s application and communicate payment requirements within four weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 09:06:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 402 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756698</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC allowed a petition challenging rejection of declarations under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. The revenue authorities had rejected applications citing bank guarantee basis and unquantified amounts. The court held that since the main noticee&#039;s declaration was accepted after amount quantification before June 30, 2019, the co-noticee was also entitled to scheme benefits. The court directed authorities to accept the co-noticee&#039;s application and communicate payment requirements within four weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>