<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 394 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756690</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the SC found no case for interference in exercise of Article 136 jurisdiction and dismissed the special leave petitions. The pending application was also disposed of. The order records no substantive adjudication on the merits beyond refusal to grant leave.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 394 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756690</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the SC found no case for interference in exercise of Article 136 jurisdiction and dismissed the special leave petitions. The pending application was also disposed of. The order records no substantive adjudication on the merits beyond refusal to grant leave.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>