<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 391 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756687</link>
    <description>Sponsorship receipts from fashion shows and sporting events were outside the unamended definition of &quot;payment for admission&quot; because they were paid for advertising, branding and business promotion, not for entry or entertainment; tax could not be levied on that basis. The retrospective insertion of Explanation 2 was not merely clarificatory, since it introduced a new taxable element without corresponding change to the charging provision, and was therefore arbitrary and unreasonable. In the absence of a specific charging provision bringing sponsorship receipts within the tax net, and with no workable machinery for their separate assessment and collection, the levy on such receipts could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 14:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 391 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756687</link>
      <description>Sponsorship receipts from fashion shows and sporting events were outside the unamended definition of &quot;payment for admission&quot; because they were paid for advertising, branding and business promotion, not for entry or entertainment; tax could not be levied on that basis. The retrospective insertion of Explanation 2 was not merely clarificatory, since it introduced a new taxable element without corresponding change to the charging provision, and was therefore arbitrary and unreasonable. In the absence of a specific charging provision bringing sponsorship receipts within the tax net, and with no workable machinery for their separate assessment and collection, the levy on such receipts could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>