<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1442 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456653</link>
    <description>Foreign tax credit relief was set aside because the appellate authority did not adequately examine the reasons for delay, did not call for a remand report from the Assessing Officer/CPC, and did not fully consider the factual and procedural basis of the Form 67 and return processing issues. The matter was restored to the appellate authority for fresh adjudication after granting the assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 20:37:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1442 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456653</link>
      <description>Foreign tax credit relief was set aside because the appellate authority did not adequately examine the reasons for delay, did not call for a remand report from the Assessing Officer/CPC, and did not fully consider the factual and procedural basis of the Form 67 and return processing issues. The matter was restored to the appellate authority for fresh adjudication after granting the assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>