<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 1278 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456668</link>
    <description>A cheque issued as security can still attract liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act if the underlying debt remains unpaid on the due date. Allegations that the cheque was blank, misused, or that the liability had already been discharged raised disputed questions of fact requiring evidence, so they could not be decided in inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC. The complaint and summoning proceedings were therefore not quashed, and the petitioner was left to pursue those defences before the trial court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 20:37:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 1278 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456668</link>
      <description>A cheque issued as security can still attract liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act if the underlying debt remains unpaid on the due date. Allegations that the cheque was blank, misused, or that the liability had already been discharged raised disputed questions of fact requiring evidence, so they could not be decided in inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC. The complaint and summoning proceedings were therefore not quashed, and the petitioner was left to pursue those defences before the trial court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>