https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456669 A challenge was raised to notifications extending the time limit for passing an adjudication order under the GST law and to the consequential adjudication order, with the petitioner seeking interim protection. The Calcutta HC directed the matter to proceed on affidavits, admitted the writ petition, and granted interim relief by staying coercive recovery steps until 31 July 2024 or until further order, whichever was earlier. The document reflects that the dispute concerns the validity and effect of time-extension notifications and the immediate need for protection against recovery pending fuller consideration. en-us Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456669 A challenge was raised to notifications extending the time limit for passing an adjudication order under the GST law and to the consequential adjudication order, with the petitioner seeking interim protection. The Calcutta HC directed the matter to proceed on affidavits, admitted the writ petition, and granted interim relief by staying coercive recovery steps until 31 July 2024 or until further order, whichever was earlier. The document reflects that the dispute concerns the validity and effect of time-extension notifications and the immediate need for protection against recovery pending fuller consideration. Case-Laws GST Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456669