<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Writ of Prohibition Denied: Court Rules on Jurisdictional Limits and Petitioner&#039;s Failure to Contest Orders.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80217</link>
    <description>The High Court considered the maintainability of a writ petition seeking a writ of prohibition despite the petitioner not challenging the allegedly erroneous orders. The Court clarified that a writ of prohibition is typically used to supervise and restrict courts or tribunals from acting beyond their jurisdiction. Reference was made to a Supreme Court case emphasizing the distinction between issuing writs of certiorari and prohibition to correct jurisdictional errors. While both writs can correct jurisdictional errors, certiorari corrects after a decision, and prohibition can prevent errors before a decision. In this case, as the appellate authority had already made a determination, issuing a writ of prohibition was deemed unnecessary. The .....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 06:46:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 06:46:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Writ of Prohibition Denied: Court Rules on Jurisdictional Limits and Petitioner&#039;s Failure to Contest Orders.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80217</link>
      <description>The High Court considered the maintainability of a writ petition seeking a writ of prohibition despite the petitioner not challenging the allegedly erroneous orders. The Court clarified that a writ of prohibition is typically used to supervise and restrict courts or tribunals from acting beyond their jurisdiction. Reference was made to a Supreme Court case emphasizing the distinction between issuing writs of certiorari and prohibition to correct jurisdictional errors. While both writs can correct jurisdictional errors, certiorari corrects after a decision, and prohibition can prevent errors before a decision. In this case, as the appellate authority had already made a determination, issuing a writ of prohibition was deemed unnecessary. The .....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 06:46:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>