<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (4) TMI 8 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37772</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the power subsidy received by the assessee was taxable under the Income-tax Act, 1961. Additionally, the expenditure incurred for constructing a railway overbridge was allowed as a deductible business expenditure. The court also ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing depreciation on roads and bridges. The High Court provided a comprehensive resolution to the issues raised in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:27:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (4) TMI 8 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37772</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the power subsidy received by the assessee was taxable under the Income-tax Act, 1961. Additionally, the expenditure incurred for constructing a railway overbridge was allowed as a deductible business expenditure. The court also ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing depreciation on roads and bridges. The High Court provided a comprehensive resolution to the issues raised in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>