<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 364 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756660</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the notice dated 30th March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for Assessment Year 2015-2016, concluding there was no substantial failure by the assessee to disclose material facts. The Court emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence for reopening assessments, which was absent, thus ruling in favor of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 364 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756660</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the notice dated 30th March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for Assessment Year 2015-2016, concluding there was no substantial failure by the assessee to disclose material facts. The Court emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence for reopening assessments, which was absent, thus ruling in favor of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>