<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 358 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756654</link>
    <description>SanDisk India was found not to constitute a dependent agent permanent establishment for the relevant year because the record did not show any related party transaction during the period, and the alleged survey material arose only after the acquisition date. The revenue also failed to produce documentary evidence that SanDisk India provided marketing support or acted on the assessee&#039;s behalf. In the absence of an established transaction or business nexus, the treatment of reimbursements as fees for technical services and the attribution of 30% of profits to India were held unsustainable, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 358 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756654</link>
      <description>SanDisk India was found not to constitute a dependent agent permanent establishment for the relevant year because the record did not show any related party transaction during the period, and the alleged survey material arose only after the acquisition date. The revenue also failed to produce documentary evidence that SanDisk India provided marketing support or acted on the assessee&#039;s behalf. In the absence of an established transaction or business nexus, the treatment of reimbursements as fees for technical services and the attribution of 30% of profits to India were held unsustainable, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>