<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (8) TMI 66 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37770</link>
    <description>The court remanded the issue of remuneration paid to Sampat &amp;amp; Co. back to the Tribunal for reconsideration for the assessment years 1963-64 and 1964-65. The commissions paid to Mangilal Sethia and Mangilal Bhikamchand were found not deductible as business expenditure. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings that the agreements with the agents were nominal and make-believe, answering in favor of the revenue. The reference was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:24:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (8) TMI 66 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37770</link>
      <description>The court remanded the issue of remuneration paid to Sampat &amp;amp; Co. back to the Tribunal for reconsideration for the assessment years 1963-64 and 1964-65. The commissions paid to Mangilal Sethia and Mangilal Bhikamchand were found not deductible as business expenditure. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings that the agreements with the agents were nominal and make-believe, answering in favor of the revenue. The reference was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>