<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 347 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756643</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the impugned assessment order due to the authorities&#039; failure to verify existing records and their casual approach in reassessment. It emphasized the finality of the previous assessment on the disputed addition of Rs. 4,25,880, rendering the reassessment invalid and unnecessary, thus preventing further litigation and harassment of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 06:44:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 347 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756643</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the impugned assessment order due to the authorities&#039; failure to verify existing records and their casual approach in reassessment. It emphasized the finality of the previous assessment on the disputed addition of Rs. 4,25,880, rendering the reassessment invalid and unnecessary, thus preventing further litigation and harassment of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>