<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 329 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756625</link>
    <description>Imported end-cut rejected CR strips in coil form were not shown to fall within the steel items specifically covered by the original Quality Control Order, so BIS certification could not be insisted upon for provisional release. The later circular broadening compliance to all steel consignments was treated as prospective and could not be applied to consignments already imported before that change. The examination material and test reports also did not conclusively establish the exact nature of the goods so as to justify withholding release. Provisional release was therefore allowed without BIS certification, while leaving any further departmental action open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 06:43:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 329 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756625</link>
      <description>Imported end-cut rejected CR strips in coil form were not shown to fall within the steel items specifically covered by the original Quality Control Order, so BIS certification could not be insisted upon for provisional release. The later circular broadening compliance to all steel consignments was treated as prospective and could not be applied to consignments already imported before that change. The examination material and test reports also did not conclusively establish the exact nature of the goods so as to justify withholding release. Provisional release was therefore allowed without BIS certification, while leaving any further departmental action open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>